TRANSFORMATION OF NATIONAL POLICY IN THE XX – EARLY XXI CENTURY: RUSSIAN EMPIRE, USSR, RUSSIAN FEDERATION

DOI: 10.47026/2712-9454-2022-3-2-20-29

УДК 93/94

ББК 63.3(2)61

Elena K. MINEEVA, Aleksey I. MINEEV, Aleksey N. STAROSTIN

Key words

state national policy, Russia, Russian Empire, USSR, ethnos

Abstract

Russia is a multinational state, the multi-ethnicity of which continues to be one of its main features even in the XXI century. In modern conditions, the problem of interethnic relations is of particular relevance. The multi-ethnicity of the Russian Federation is an objective circumstance, which we have no right not to take into account, especially since the federalism of our country is based on the national-territorial principle. Each state has its own historical past, on which its content and form, internal and external political relations depend. Russia has a rich and instructive history, which not only affects the present, but also largely determines its future. The gathering of East Slavic tribes around the Kyiv center, the collapse of the single Old Russian state during the period of feudal fragmentation, the creation of Muscovy as a single centralized state, the formation of the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union, the demise of the USSR, and the formation of a peculiar post-Soviet history – all these are specific stages of the Russian past.

The article presents an overview of the implementation of national policy in the XX – early XXI century within the framework of the existence of the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union, and the Russian Federation. An appeal to the history of national relations in Russia and to the experience of Soviet national policy is very relevant in modern times. The national question naturally acted as one of the main problems in different historical epochs. In modern conditions, Russia is still a multi-ethnic state, uniting peoples of different language groups, cultures and confessions. The ethnic core of the country is the Russian people, constituting more than 80% of its population. At the same time, the territory of Russia remains the historical homeland of many peoples who have retained their ethnic identity and created the foundations of their statehood during the years of the Soviet period.

References

1. Alekseev D.I. Natsional’noe samosoznanie v strukture mezhetnicheskikh otnoshenii (otechestvennyi opyt): avtoref. dis. … kand. filosof. Nauk [National self-consciousness in the structure of interethnic relations (domestic experience): Abstract of Cand. Diss.]. Moscow, 2004, 29 р.
2. Antsiferova N.G. Etnicheskaya tolerantnost’ v sovremennom rossiiskom obshchestve: sostoyanie i tendentsii razvitiya: dis. … kand. sots. nauk [Ethnic tolerance in modern Russian society: state and development trends: Abstract of Cand. Diss.]. Moscow, 2007, 209 р.
3. Gorovskii F.Ya., Rymarenko Yu.I. Natsional’nyi vopros i sotsialisticheskaya praktika: Opyt istoriko-teoreticheskogo analiza [National Question and Socialist Practice: An Experience of Historical and Theoretical Analysis]. Kiev, Vishcha shkola Publ., 1991, 253 р.
4. Zasedanie Soveta po mezhnatsional’nym otnosheniyam ot 30 marta 2021 g. [Meeting of the Council for Interethnic Relations on March 30, 2021]. Available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/65252 (Access Date: 2022, Apr. 19).
5. Medvedev N.P. Mezhnatsional’nye konflikty i politicheskaya stabil’nost’ [Interethnic conflicts and political stability]. Saransk, 1993, 60 р.
6. Mineeva E.K. Narkomnats RSFSR: tseli, zadachi, struktura [Narkomnats RSFSR: goals, objectives, structure]. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta, 2006, no. 7, рр. 23–33.
7. Mineeva E.K. Natsional’nyi vopros v pervye gody sovetskoi vlasti: teoriya i praktika [The National Question in the First Years of Soviet Power: Theory and Practice]. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 2007, no. 2, рр. 161–165.
8. Mineeva E.K. Stanovlenie Mariiskoi, Mordovskoi i Chuvashskoi avtonomii v 20–30-e gody XX veka: dis. … dok. ist. nauk [Formation of the Mari, Mordovian and Chuvash autonomies in the 20–30s of the XX century: Doct. Diss.]. Cheboksary, 2008, 534 р.
9. Pyat’ znamenitykh tsitat Borisa El’tsina [Five famous quotes from Boris Yeltsin]. Rossiiskaya gazeta, 2013, Dec. 31.
10. Khmara N.I. Natsional’naya i regional’naya politika v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: osnovy kursa [National and regional policy in the Russian Federation: the basics of the course]. Moscow, 2005, 332 р.
11. Shcherbak A.N., Bolyachevets L.S., Platonova E.S. Istoriya sovetskoi natsional’noi politiki: kolebaniya mayatnika? [History of Soviet nationality policy: pendulum swings?]. Politicheskaya nauka, 2016, 1, рр. 100–123.

Information about the authors

Elena K. Mineeva – Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Russian History, Chuvash State University, Russia, Cheboksary (mineevaek21@mail.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8301-9951).

Aleksey I. Mineev – Candidate of Historical Sciences, Head of Research and Training Center 1C, Leader Soft Implementation Center LLC, Russia, Cheboksary (minalig@inbox.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5791-6210).

Aleksey N. Starostin – Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Theology, Ural State Mining University, Russia, Ekaterinburg (alisheria@mail.ru).

For citations

Mineeva E.K., Mineev A.I., Starostin A.N. TRANSFORMATION OF NATIONAL POLICY IN THE XX – EARLY XXI CENTURY: RUSSIAN EMPIRE, USSR, RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Historical Search, 2022, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 20–29. DOI: 10.47026/2712-9454-2022-3-2-20-29 (in Russian).

Download the full article