Constantine Porphyrogenitus: Άτελκουζου Constantine = Porphyrogenitus: Atelkuzu

DOI: 10.47026/2712-9454-2023-4-4-75-82

УДК 930.2:811.512.1’373.21

ББК Ш12=63*316.1г(2)6

Gennadiy E. KORNILOV

Key words

Constantine Porphyrogenitus, Άτελκουζου/ Telcos, Атăл, Idel, Il, Etel köz; köz, KS/KS, K/C; коç/куç; bash(y)/bash(i)

Abstract

The treatise of Konstantin Porphyrogenitus “On the Management of the Empire” is the most authoritative source on toponymy and ethnonymics of Eastern Europe regions associated with the early history of the ancestors of the modern Slavs, Turks and Indo-Iranians, so every name mentioned in it continues to arouse the most lively interest to this day.

The purpose of the study is to introduce some data that are not taken into account by historians-medievalists and evaluate the interpretations proposed by the author when reading E.M. Usmanov’s publications “On the Problem of Interpreting Medieval European Sources about the Ancestral Homeland of the Hungarians” and “The Hingilus River and the “Turks” of Konstantin Porphyrogenitus”.

Materials and methods. The main research methods were the method of analyzing historical sources, including those used by predecessors, and the historical-genetic method. The article presents the views of those who had already addressed the problem of interpreting the geographical name Atel Kuzu mentioned in Konstantin’s treatise, as well as additional information from dictionaries and other historical and linguistic sources.

Study results. The article establishes incorrectness of: 1) attributing the name Atel kuzu to the Kypchak source, since it has a bright Oguz phonomorphological appearance; 2) attributing the meaning “source; top of the river” to the Bashkir word кѳҙ/күҙ; 3) searching for the territory called Atel kuzu in the Southern Urals. Based on the material of toponymic dictionaries, it is proved that in all the names of the river sources recorded in the territory of Bashkortostan are formed on the basis of the geographical nomenclature term bash “head; beginning; source, top”, it turns out that the Oguz appearance of the toponym Atel Kuzu is associated with the fact that all medieval authors consistently call the Hungarians as the Turks.

Conclusions. The new, sensational derivation of the etymology for the historical toponym Atel Kuzu basing on the data of the modern Bashkir language does not stand up to criticism.

References

1. Ashmarin N.I. Slovar’ chuvashskogo yazyka [The dictionary of the Chuvash language]. Kazan, Cheboksary, 1928–1950, vol. 1–17.
2. Gabrielyan R.A., Eremyan T., eds. Armyano-alanskie otnosheniya (I-X vv.) [Armenian-Alanian relations (1^th–10^th centuries)]. Erevan, 1981, 143 p.
3. Egorov V.G. Etimologicheskii slovar’ chuvashskogo yazyka [Etymological dictionary Chuvash]. Cheboksary, Chuvash Publ. House, 1964, 355 p.
4. Kamalov A.A. Bashkirskaya toponimiya [The Bashkir toponymy]. Ufa, Kitup Publ., 1994, 304 p.
5. Kamalov A.A. Bashkirskie geograficheskie terminy i toponimiya [Bashkir geographical terms and toponymy]. Ufa, Kitap Publ., 1997, 383 p.
6. Komar A.V. Drevnie mad’yary. Etel’keza: perspektivy issledovaniy [Ancient Magyars. Etelkeza: Research Perspectives]. In: Vtoroy Mezhdunarodnyy Mad’yarskiy simpozium [Second International Magyar Symposium]. Chelyabinsk, Rifey Publ., 2013. pp. 182–230.
7. Konstantin Bagryanorodnyy. Ob upravlenii imperiey: tekst, per., comment [On managing an empire]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1989, 493 p.
8. KornilovE. Itogi vnutrisemeinoi divergentsii ili rezul’taty substitutsii? (Zapozdalyi polilog po povodu bashkiro-tataro-chuvashskogo nazvaniya reki Volgi) [Results of intrafamilial divergence or results of substitutions? (A belated polylogue on the Bashkir-Tatar-Chuvash name of the Volga River)]. In: Ashmarinskie chteniya: sb. st. Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Cheboksary, 21 oktyabrya 2022 g.) [Proc. of Rus. Conf. «Ashmarine readings»]. Cheboksary, Chuvash State University Publ., 2022, pp. 52–59.
9. Kornilov G.E. Istoriografiya Khazarskogo gosudarstva: mezhdistsiplinarnyy dialog po povodu onomatologicheskikh ekskursov i passazhey istorika-medievista [Historiography of the Khazar state: interdisciplinary dialogue on onomatological excursions and passages of a medievalist historian]. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta, 2023, no. 1, pp. 15–24.
10. Novosel’tsev A.P. Khazarskoe gosudarstvo i ego rol’ v istorii Vostochnoi Evropy i Kavkaza [The Khazar state and its role in the history of Eastern Europe and the Caucasus]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1990, 264 p.
11. Rona-Tash Andrash. Khazary i mad’yary [Khazars and Magyars]. In: Evrei i slavyane [Khazars. Jews and Slavs]. Moscow, Ierusalim, Mosty kul’tury – Gesharim Publ., 2005, vol. 16, pp. 111–124.
12. Rybakov B.A. Russkie zemli na karte Idrisi 1154 goda [Russian lands on the map of Idrisi in 1154]. Kratkie soobshcheniya instituta istorii material’noy kul’tury [Brief communications of the Institute of the History of Material Culture]. Moscow, 1952, vol. XLIII, pp. 3–44.
13. Slovar’ toponimov Bashkirskoi ASSR [The Dictionary of toponyms of the Bashkir ASSR]. Ufa, Bashkir Publ. House, 1980, 200 p.
14. Sukri A. Ashkharatsuits [Show the World]. Venetsiya, 1881.
15. Usmanov E.M. K probleme interpretatsii srednevekovykh evropeyskikh istochnikov o prarodine vengrov [On the problem of interpreting medieval European sources about the ancestral homeland of the Hungarians]. In: Materialy po arkheologii i istorii antichnogo i srednevekovogo Kryma [Materials on archeology and history of ancient and medieval Crimea]. Simferopol, Tyumen, Nizhnevartovsk, 2016. vol. 8, pp. 455–474.
16. Usmanov E.M. Reka Khingilus i «turki» Konstantina Bagryanorodnogo [The Khingilus River and the “Turks” of Constantine Porphyrogenitus]. In: Ural–Altai: cherez veka v budushhee: materialy VIII Vseros. tyurkologicheskoi konf. (s mezhdunar. uchastiem), posvyashh. 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya narodnogo poeta Bashkortostana Mustaya Karima [Proc. of Conf. «Ural–Altai: through centuries into the future»]. Ufa, 2019, pp. 251–256.
17. Fedotov M.R. Etimologicheskiy slovar’ chuvashskogo yazyka: v 2 t. [Etymological dictionary Chuvash. 2 vols.]. Cheboksary, 1996, vols. I–II.
18. Constantine Porphyrogenitus. De administrando imperio. Washington, 1967, vol. 1, pp. 172–173.
19. Zimonyi I. István Zimonyi: Muslimische Quellen über die Ungarn vor der Landsnahme. Das ungarische Kapitel der Gaiharu-Tradition. Herne: Gabriele Schäfer, 2006.
20. Zlatarski V.N. Pismata na carigradskija patriarh Nikolaj Mistik do bŭlgarskija car Simeon [The letters of the Tsarigrad Patriarch Nicholas the Mystic to the Bulgarian Tsar Simeon]. za narodni umotvoreniya, nauka i knizhnina [Sat. for popular thoughts, science and literature]. Sofiya, vol. XII, 1895.

Information about the author

Gennadiy E. Kornilov – Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor of Russian Language and Literature Department, Chuvash State University, Russia, Cheboksary (gennkorn@rambler.ru).

For citations

Kornilov G.E. CONSTANTINE PORPHYROGENITUS: ΆΤΕΛΚΟΥΖΟΥ CONSTANTINE = PORPHYROGENITUS: ATELKUZU. Historical Search, 2023, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 75–82. DOI: 10.47026/2712-9454-2023-4-4-75-82 (in Russian).

Download the full article