Geoinformation systems in the study of Muslim holy sites in the Southern Urals

DOI: 10.47026/2712-9454-2023-4-4-5-18

УДК 902.26

ББК 63.4(2)+32.972

Albina F. VALEEVA, Ainur I. TUZBEKOV

Key words

mausoleum, the Muslims, the Southern Urals, geoinformation systems, sacralization, archaeological sites, Sufism, sacred places

Abstract

In the recent decade, there has been a tendency in the Southern Urals to reconstruct old holy places and to form new ones revered by the Muslims. To date, more than 115 such objects have been recorded. Most of them are revered only by residents of small villages, but some have become important for the Muslims throughout the region.

The purpose of the study is to determine the most popular places of worship for the Muslims in the Southern Urals. Considering that some of the objects of regional importance have been revered by the Muslims since the XIV century, and others, having appeared relatively recently, quickly became one of the most visited places, it is necessary to determine the factors influencing the growth of this popularity.

Historiographical base of the study. The research team analyzed the works of domestic and foreign authors, which mainly describe the conditions of the studied objects, religious rituals, organized events, etc. In addition, it was possible to attract the experience of researchers in implementing projects in geoinformation systems in religious studies.

Materials and methods of the study. Geoinformation methods were used for the study. Based on archival materials, developments of archaeologists, ethnographers, theologians, culture experts, materials of Internet communities and other open sources, as well as the free cross-platform geoinformation system Quantum GIS, we have created the following layers: 1) mausoleums; 2) places of worship according to the data given by Russia’s Central Spiritual Governance for the Muslims; 3) places of worship according to the Internet community in the social network VKontakte Sufi RB; 4) religious tourist routes.

Study results. Thanks to the use of geoinformation systems, it was possible to identify the most popular holy places among the Muslims of the Southern Urals. It is established that the most actively visited objects are the mausoleum of Hussein Bey in Chishminsky district of the Republic of Bashkortostan and the Ilchigulovo-IV burial mound (the sacred mountain Narystau) in Miyakinsky district of the Republic of Bashkortostan.

Conclusions. The results of the study indicate that the popularity of objects is influenced by a number of factors, among which the presence of a monumental structure, representation of the object in the media space and the Internet, as well as availability of objective scientific data about it are of key importance.

References

1. Akhatov A.T., Bakhshiev I.I., Tuzbekov A.I. Rol’ arkheologicheskikh ob”ektov v formirovanii novykh sakral’nykh prostranstv Yuzhnogo Urala [Role of archaeological sites in the formation of new sacral spaces of the Southern Ural]. Ural’skii istoricheskii vestnik, 2016, no. 4(53). pp. 33–42.
2. Bashkirskoe narodnoe tvorchestvo. T. 2. Predaniya i legendy [Bashkir folk art. Vol. 2: Traditions and legends]. Ufa, Bashknizhizdat Publ, 1987, pp. 173–179.
3. Botalov S.G., Garustovich G.N., Yaminov A.F. Novye materialy po mavzoleyam Zaural’ya i Tsentral’nogo Kazakhstana [New materials on mausoleums of Trans-Urals and Central Kazakhstan]. In:Nasledie vekov. Okhrana i izuchenie pamyatnikov arkheologii v Bashkortostane: sb. statej. [Article in the collection «The legacy of centuries. Protection and study of archaeological monuments in Bashkortostan»]. Ufa, 1995, pp. 148–165..
4. Garustovich G.N. Eshche raz o datirovkakh musul’manskikh kirpichnykh mavzoleev stepnoi polosy Volgo-Ural’skogo regiona [Once more on dating of Moslem brickwork mausoleums from the steppe belt of the Volga-Ural region]. Zolotoordynskaya tsivilizatsiya, 2012, no. 5, pp. 126–136.
5. Garustovich G.N. K voprosu o khronologii kirpichnykh mavzoleev v stepnoi polose Yuzhnogo Urala i Zapadnogo Kazakhstana [On the chronology of brick mausoleums in the steppe zone of the Southern Urals and Western Kazakhstan]. Vestnik VEGU, 2013, no. 1(63), pp. 108–113.
6. Garustovich G.N. Osobennosti rasprostraneniya islama sredi bashkir v epokhu srednevekov’ya [Features of the spread of Islam among Bashkirs in the Middle Ages]. Ufimskii arkheologicheskii vestnik, 2013, iss. 13, pp. 137–143.
7. Garustovich G.N. Pogrebeniya v kamennykh mavzoleyakh Bashkirskogo Priural’ya [Burials in stone mausoleums of the Bashkir Urals]. In: Nasledie vekov. Okhrana i izuchenie pamyatnikov arkheologii v Bashkortostane, 1995, no. 1, pp. 166–185.
8. Zilivinskaya E.D. Arkhitektura Zolotoi Ordy. Chast’ 1. Kul’tovoe zodchestvo [Architecture of the Golden Horde. Part 1. Cult architecture.]. Kazan, Otechestvo Publ, 2014, 228 p.
9. Interv’yu na gore Yaryshtau 2014 g. [Interview on Mount Yaryshtau 2014]. In: Internet-soobshchestvo «Sufi RB»: sajt. [Website of the Internet community «Sufi RB»]. Available at: https://vk.com/club78436717?w=wall-78436717_39/all (Access Date: 2023, Mar. 1).
10. Karta sakral’nykh mest Kazakhstana [Map of sacred places of Kazakhstan]. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=1BwcEkPojilm0uPSqHHUg8yNJHrNCgzub&fbclid=IwAR0pcAgd72WDbzODO8OXaPrIFcOI13KywSMlcpB_pBWvyFEIbx9pqyzdyow&ll=47.06374379084219%2C66.40400046716036&z=4 (Access Date: 2023, Jan. 1).
11. Matyushko I.V. Srednevekovye mavzolei v Orenburgskoi oblasti [Medieval mausoleums in the Orenburg region]. In: Arkheologicheskie pamyatniki Orenburzh’ya: sb. nauch. tr. [Collection of scientific papers «Archaeological monuments of Orenburg region»]. Orenburg, 2011, pp. 146–155.
12. Matyushko I.V. Syrtsovyi mavzolei na territorii Orenburzh’ya [The raw mausoleum on the territory of Orenburg region]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 2016, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 153–160.
13. Narystau [Narystau]. In: Bashkirskoe dolgoletie. Turizm: sajt. [The website «Bashkir longevity. Tourism»] Available at: https://xn--c1abeaopbvc6b.xn--90alcrhmdckk5a.xn--p1ai/tours/346/(Access Date: 2023, Feb. 1).
14. Petrov F.N. Traditsionnoe mirovospriyatie narodov stepnoi Evrazii [Traditional worldview of the peoples of Steppe Eurasia]. Chelyabinsk, Krokus Publ, 2006, 192 p.
15. Regional’nye sakral’nye ob”ekty Kazakhstana [Regional sacred objects of Kazakhstan]. Astana, Foliant Publ, 2017, 504 p.
16. Sakral’nye ob”ekty Kazakhstana obshchenatsional’nogo znacheniya [Sacred objects of Kazakhstan of national significance]. Astana, Foliant Publ, 2017, 496 p.
17. Svyashchennaya gora Narystau i CHishminskie mavzolei [The sacred mountain of Narystau and the Chishmin mausoleums]. In: Turisticheskaya kompaniya «BashAdventure»: sait. [The website «BashAdventure» Travel Company»]. Available at: https://www.bashadventure.ru/catalog/ural/na-1-den/svyashchennaya-gora-narystau-i-chishminskie-mavzolei/ (Access Date: 2023, Feb. 1).
18. Sohbet u makama Ural batyra [Sohbet at makam Ural Batyr]. In: Internet-soobshchestvo «Sufi RB»: sait. [Website of the Internet community «Sufi RB»]. Available at: https://vk.com/club78436717?w=wall-78436717_1368/all (Access Date: 2023, March 1).
19. Khabibullina Z.R. Palomnichestvo musul’man k mogilam «svyatykh» v pole deyatel’nosti upolnomochennogo Soveta po delam religioznykh kul’tov v BASSR [The Muslim pilgrimage to the graves of «saints» in the sphere of activities of the commissioner of the council for religious affairs in the Bashkir Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic]. In: Obshchestvo. Tsivilizatsiya: Chetvertye Kuzeevskie chteniya: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Proc. of Int. Sci. Conf. «Ethnic group. Society. Civilization: The Fourth Kuzeyev Readings»]. Ufa, 2015, pp. 201–204.
20. Shejh Usman u Aldar batyra [Sheikh Usman at Aldar Batyr]. In: Internet-soobshchestvo «Sufi RB»: sait. [Website of the Internet community «Sufi RB»]. Available at: https://vk.com/club78436717?w=wall-78436717_2102/all (Access Date: 2023, March 1).
21. Yunusova A.B. Elektronnyi resurs «Islam na Yuzhnom Urale» [Islam in the South Urals: spatial analysis]. Izvestiya Ufimskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN, 2016, no. 4, pp. 102–109.
22. Graml C., Hunziker M., Vukadin K. Cult and Crisis: A GIS Approach to the Sacred Landscape of Hellenistic Attica. Open Archaeology, 2019, no. 5, pp. 383–395.
23. Papantoniou G., Kyriakou N. Sacred Landscapes and the Territoriality of Iron Age Cypriot Polities: The Applicability of GIS. American Journal of Archaeology, 2018, no. 122(4), pp. 541–
24. Tuzbekov A.I., Bakhshiev I.I. Reuse of ancient sacred places in South Ural region – the case of emir Edigey’s grave. Studia Mythologica Slavica, 2019, vol. 22, pp. 135–141.

Information about the authors

Albina F. Valeeva – 2^nd year Master’s Program Student, Ufa University of Science and Technology; Intern Researcher, Institute of Ethnological Research named after R.G. Kuzeev Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia, Ufa (alb213@mail.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8412-7072).

Ainur I. Tuzbekov – Candidate of Historical Sciences, Head of the Department of Archaeological Heritage, Southern Urals Institute of Ethnological Research named after R.G. Kuzeeva of the Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia, Ufa (aituzbekov@gmail.com; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5895-9826).

For citations

For citations: Valeeva A.F., Tuzbekov A.I. GEOINFORMATION SYSTEMS IN THE STUDY OF MUSLIM HOLY SITES IN THE SOUTHERN URALS. Historical Search, 2023, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 5–18. DOI: 10.47026/2712-9454-2023-4-4-5-18 (in Russian).

Download the full article