IMAGES OF THE FIRST PRIMAL FOREFATHERS OF THE HUNNO-BULGARS AND THEIR ETHNOGENETIC TRADITIONS

DOI: 10.47026/1810-1909-2023-3-122-131

УДК 811.512.1’01:398.1

ББК Ш12=635*000.4:[Т51(2)4(635)-72+Т51(4)41-99-72]

Vitaliy G. RODIONOV

Key words

ethnolinguistics, etymology, ancient contacts, names of the primal forefathers, symbols of rituals, Chinese pre-philosophy

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to trace the evolutionary path of the images of the primal forefathers of the Hunno-Bulgars and their descendants.

Materials and methods. Ethnographic data from ancient and later sources were used, an ethnolinguistic and comparative approach to the study was applied. The etymological works of modern linguists-Turkologists are considered.

Results. In this article, the word “primal forefather” refers to the “natural-ancestral divine essence” of Eastern (primarily Chinese) antiquity. The most ancient images of the Hunno-Bulgars’ primal forefathers were formed in the pre-Altai era. They reflected the surrounding world of ancient hunters, primarily the world of wild animals. People concluded an agreement on mutual donation with the ancestral primal forefather *taŋgïrï (“oath”, “deity”). In the era of contacts with the ancestors of the Chinese, the Huns (Xiongnu) began to represent their primal forefather as a celestial inhabitant, setting the world in motion by shifting the masculine and feminine principles. In different epochs of interrelations with the tribes of Eastern Iranians, the culture of the ancestors of the Bulgaro-Chuvash experienced the beneficial effect of their “animal style”. In the early Middle Ages, various narrative texts about the primal forefathers-giants and epic heroes-bogatyrs began to appear in their folk art. The ethnogenetic legends of the Chuvash eventually transformed into legends about the origin of their settlements.

Conclusions. A comparative analysis of the images of the primal forefathers of the ancient ancestors of the Hunno-Bulgars and their descendants showed that these images were constantly evolving, gaining new features. At first they appeared to people in the guise of a sacred animal; a little later, instead of the leading animal, the primal forefather-hunter appears who finds new lands; then the Bulgarian plot of the ethnogenetic legend gradually turns into a narrative about an extraordinary giant hero, surprising with his physique and strength. The Turkic–speaking peoples of the Volga region and the Urals called such a hero Ulap/Alp, and the meadow Mari and the Udmurts – Onar and Alangasar.

References

1. Ashmarin N.I. Slovar’ chuvashskogo yazyka: v 17 t. [Dictionary of the Chuvash language. 17 vols.]. Cheboksary, Russika Publ., 2000, vol. 17, 440 p.
2. Gadlo A.V. Etnicheskaya istoriya Severnogo Kavkaza IV-X vv. [Ethnic history of the North Caucasus IV–X centuries]. Leningrad, Leningrad State University Publ., 1979, 216 p.
3. Gumilev L.N. Aziatskii istok traditsii chuvashskogo narodnogo iskusstva [Asian source of the traditions of the Chuvash folk art]. Sovetskaya Chuvashiya, 1959, Aug. 18.
4. Gumilev L.N., Kryukova T.A., Khvan M.F. Kitaiskie pis’mena na chuvashskoi rubakhe [Chinese letters on the Chuvash shirt]. Chuvashskii gumanitarnyi vestnik, 2006, no. 1, pp. 171–188.
5. Dybo A.V. Lingvisticheskie kontakty rannikh tyurkov. Leksicheskii fond. Pratyurkskii period [Linguistic contacts of the early Turks. Lexical fund. Proto-Turkic period]. Moscow, 2007, 222 p.
6. Egorov N.I. Po sledam zlatorogogo olenya [In the footsteps of the golden-horned deer] Izbrannye trudy. Etimologiya. Etnoglotogenez. Etnolingvokul’turologiya: v 2 t. [Selected works. Etymology. Ethnoglotogenesis. Ethnolinguoculturology. 2 vols.]. Cheboksary, Novoe vremya Publ., 2009, vol. 2, рp. 33–41.
7. O proiskhozhdenii i deyaniyakh getov (Gettica) [On the origin and deeds of the Getae (Gettica)]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya Publ., 2000, 512 p.
8. Rodionov V.G, Kirillova I.Yu., Nikiforova V. Istoriya chuvashskoi literatury XVIII–XIX vekov: kollektivnaya monografiya [History of Chuvash literature of the 18^th and 19^th centuries: a collective monograph]. Cheboksary, Chuvash Publ. House, 2020, 296 p.
9. Luk’yanov A.E. Stanovlenie filosofii na Vostoke (Drevnii Kitai i Indiya) [Formation of philosophy in the East (Ancient China and India)]. Moscow, 1992, 208 p.
10. Musaev K.M. Predstavleniya tyurok o nebe, nebesnykh telakh i yavleniyakh [Ideas of the Turks about the sky, celestial bodies and phenomena]. In: Prirodnoe okruzhenie i material’naya kul’tura pratyurkskikh narodov [Natural environment and material culture of the pra-Turkic peoples]. Moscow, 2008, 342 p.
11. Adygskii geroicheskii epos [Narts. Adyghe heroic epic]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1974, 415 p.
12. Puteshestvie Abu Khamida al-Garnati v Vostochnuyu i Tsentral’nuyu Evropu (1131–1153) [Journey of Abu Hamid al-Garnati to Eastern and Central Europe (1131–1153)]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1971, 136 p.
13. Rodionov V.G. «Zapiska» («Risala») Ibn Fadlana i osobennosti rannego formirovaniya volzhskikh bulgar [“Note” (“Risala”) by Ibn Fadlan and features of the early formation of the Volga Bulgars]. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta, 2022, no. 2, pр. 98–111.
14. Rodionov V.G. Nikolai Ashmarin kak mifolog-istorik pervoi chetverti XX veka [Nikolai Ashmarin as a mythologist-historian of the first quarter of the 20^th century]. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta, 2020, no. 2, рp. 117–128.
15. Rodionov V.G. Kul’tura. Slovo [Ethnos. Culture. Word]. Cheboksary, Chuvash University Publ., 2006, 552 p.
16. Sevortyan E.V. Etimologicheskii slovar’ tyurkskikh yazykov (Obshchetyurkskie i mezhtyurkskie osnovy na glasnye) [Etymological Dictionary of Turkic Languages ​​(Common Turkic and Inter-Turkic Vowel Bases)]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1974, 767 p.
17. Sravnitel’no-istoricheskaya grammatika tyurkskikh yazykov. Leksika [Comparative-historical grammar of Turkic languages. Vocabulary]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2006, 908 p.
18. Shpilevskii S.M. Drevnie goroda i drugie bulgarsko-tatarskie pamyatniki Kazanskoi gubernii [Ancient cities and other Bulgarian-Tatar monuments of the Kazan province]. Kazan, University Publ., 1877, 585 p.
19. Shutskii Yu.K. Kitaiskaya klassicheskaya «Kniga Peremen» (Itszin) [Chinese classical “Book of Changes” (Yijing)]. Moscow, Russian Book Publishing Association Publ., 1993, 382 p.
20. Chavash khalakh pultarulakhe. Tavralakh khalapesem. Perremesh keneke [Chuvash folk art. Local legends. First book]. Cheboksary, Chuvash Publ. House, 2013, 494 p.

Information about the author

Vitaliy G. Rodionov – Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor of Chuvash Philology and Culture Department, Chuvash State University, Russia, Cheboksary (vitrod1@yandex.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0143-7952).

For citations

Rodionov V.G. IMAGES OF THE FIRST PRIMAL FOREFATHERS OF THE HUNNO-BULGARS AND THEIR ETHNOGENETIC TRADITIONS. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta, 2023, no. 3, pp. 122–131. DOI: 10.47026/1810-1909-2023-3-122-131 (in Russian).

Download the full article